AIUsage vs rtk

Both claim to cut your Claude bill. They solve different problems. Here's how to pick.

Run the free audit at aiusage.ai →
DimensionAIUsagertk
PitchStop overpaying for Claude — 70-90% on same promptsCLI proxy that reduces LLM token consumption by 60-90% on common dev commands
Savings claim70-90% (6 verified cases: 76-84%)60-90% on dev commands
Workload coverageAny Claude API workload — support, agents, code review, content, CRM codegenCLI dev-command outputs only
SetupOne-line code change (swap API endpoint)Single Rust binary, zero dependencies
Free auditYes — paste bill, see number, no signupTypically no
Mechanism disclosurePrivate — "try it, the number is testable"Filters and compresses terminal command outputs (ls, grep, git log, test results) before they reach Claude Code's context
ScopeBroad (workload-agnostic)narrow — terminal output compression inside Claude Code

When rtk is the right choice

If your Claude usage is cli dev-command outputs only and you're comfortable with single rust binary, zero dependencies, rtk is purpose-built for that shape. 30.8k GitHub stars if that matters to you.

When AIUsage is the right choice

If your Claude spend spans multiple workload types (support automation, agent loops, code review, content drafting, daily coding) or you want to audit your bill before you commit to any cost-reduction tool, AIUsage gives you the number first. No CLI install, no platform dependency, no code rewrite.

Key difference

rtk saves tokens on terminal command outputs inside Claude Code. AIUsage saves on your entire Claude API monthly bill across any workload shape.

Verified AIUsage savings cases

Across six audited workloads, AIUsage's measured delta was 76-84% on the same prompts, blind A/B tested:

Audit your own Claude bill (free) →