MeterCall vs Arcade.dev

Both built for agents. One is shipped to scale.

Arcade.dev and MeterCall agree on the thesis: agents need tools. MeterCall's angle is scale — 2,400 modules vs ~100, x402 agent payments live, flat $0.001 per call, no seat-based billing.

2,400 modules · x402 live · $0.001/call
Start free → Migrate from Arcade

The one-line difference

Arcade is an agent tool platform with strong OAuth-for-agents primitives and a curated set of integrations. MeterCall is the scale play: 24x the catalog, on-chain agent payments via x402, and a flat per-call meter instead of seats.

Arcade.dev

Agent-first tool platform. Strong OAuth-on-behalf-of-user flows, polished SDK, curated ~100-integration catalog. Typically priced on plans/seats for developer usage.

MeterCall

Agent-first tool meter. 2,400 production-wired modules. Flat $0.001/call. Agents pay via x402 from their own wallet. One HTTPS endpoint, any framework.

Side by side

Honest comparison. Arcade has a polished auth flow. MeterCall has scale, crypto-native agent payments, and per-call pricing.

  Arcade.dev MeterCall
Catalog size ~100 curated integrations 2,400 modules
Agent-pay Developer-billed x402 live — agents pay per call from their own wallet
Pricing Plan/seat-based Flat $0.001/call, no seats, no tiers
OAuth-on-behalf-of-user Strong — first-class primitive Supported — BYO credential header
Framework lock-in Arcade SDK + tool shape Plain HTTPS. Works with any framework.
Best fit Teams that want Arcade's polished OAuth-for-agents flow Teams that want scale, per-call pricing, and on-chain agent payments
What we are NOT Not trying to match Arcade's OAuth-on-behalf-of-user UX step-for-step. MeterCall's thesis is scale + per-call + x402 — not a prettier consent screen.

24x the catalog. Same agent thesis.

Beta is open. $0.001 per call. Agents pay via x402.

Join the Beta See all comparisons
Honest disclosure: Arcade's OAuth-for-agents flow is best-in-class. MeterCall competes on scale, pricing model, and on-chain payments — not consent UX.