If you're running Claude at $500+ per month, you're probably paying for waste you didn't write — retries, redundant context, agent chains that loop more than they need to. AIUsage audits your last 30 days and shows you exactly what you'd save. Same prompts in, same outputs out, smaller bill.
Run my free audit →Real 30-day measurement on a small SaaS customer-support auto-reply workload. 50-sample blind A/B — no team member could distinguish AIUsage outputs from the original Claude outputs.
| Workload | Before | After | Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRM UI codegen (indie hacker) | $312 | $74 | 76% |
| Support auto-reply (small SaaS, EU) | $1,840 | $287 | 84% |
| Content drafting (freelancer, APAC) | $96 | $18 | 81% |
| Agent research loop (agency, UK) | $2,490 | $498 | 80% |
| Code-review bot (engineering team) | $640 | $112 | 82% |
| Daily coding assistant (developer) | $145 | $29 | 80% |
Before: $312 / month.
After: $74 / month.
Code change: one line (swap your API endpoint).
Output difference: zero.
No. We've blind-tested 50-sample batches across every verified case. No team has been able to distinguish AIUsage outputs from the original Claude outputs.
Your Anthropic key is forwarded transparently, never stored. Prompts flow server-side with PII scrubbing before any indexing. Hashes only, never raw.
The audit tells you upfront. If your delta is under 40%, we say so and you walk. No commitment, no subscription.
The audit is the answer. Paste your last 30 days, see what you'd save. If the number lands, the mechanism behind it is the moat — we don't describe it, you test it.